To sum up, the exploitation of oil in Darfur flew into the socio-political instability already present in Sudan. Two important things can be depicted; firstly, globalization opened the doors to a conflict that crossed borders and that was fed by economical international alliances, whereas it could have remained strictly related to the social divergent beliefs inside the population. Secondly, we should be careful while referring to Darfur’s conflict as a genocide, because genocides are exclusively associated to the results of discrimination forms. Indeed, economy plays a major impact in the conflict between the Islamic and non-Islamic parts of Soudan. I personally believe that the most important points that we can grasp from this conflict is that the legitimacy of certain international organism, such as the United Nations, can be questioned and that globalization can be harmful as well as helpful to emerging countries with frail economies: it is a double-edged sword. We should take advantage of what globalization offers us, like the accessibility to international news or to social networks, to stand up and to denounce Darfur's atrocities. Non governmental organizations such as Amnisty International are accessible to us, so reach out and make a difference!